Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Sherman Ballard v. Jack Tuter, et al
as 25-14292
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN DE'IVORY BALLARD
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE JACK TUTER, JUDGE CATALINA M. AVALOS, CLERK OF COURT BRENDA FORMAN and others
Brenda Forman v. Al Schmidt
as 25-2013
Plaintiff:
BRENDA FORMAN
Defendant:
AL SCHMIDT, Secretary of the Commonwealth
Appellant:
RENEE FAGAN
Jefney Philistin v. State Attorney Harold F. Pryor, et al
as 25-10879
Petitioner:
JEFNEY PHILISTIN
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY, HAROLD PRYOR, MICHAEL J. SATZ and others
Robinson-Washington v. Porth et al
as 0:2025cv60155
Defendant:
Ari Abraham Porth, Ernest Krolla, Brenda Forman and others
Plaintiff:
Andramedia Cheryl Robinson-Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Philistin, Jeffney v. Harold F. Pryor et al
as 0:2025cv60089
Defendant:
Mark A. Horn, Howard Forman, Brenda Forman and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffney Philistin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Adams v. Brenda Forman, et al
as 24-12054
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF COURT and BRENDA FORMAN
Plaintiff:
DANIEL THOMAS ADAMS
Remoi Campbell v. State of Florida, et al
as 24-10689
Petitioner:
REMOI CAMPBELL
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LINDA DOGGETT, BRENDA FORMAN and others
FORMAN v. SCHMIDT
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
BRENDA FORMAN
Defendant:
AL SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Campbell v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Remoi Campbell
Respondent:
State of Florida, Linda Doggett, Brenda Forman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
REMOI CAMPBELL
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, LINDA DOGGETT, BRENDA FORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
