Cases 1 - 10 of 263
COLEMAN v. CLODGO et al
as 1:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
SOPHIA R. COLEMAN
Defendant:
BRENT CLODGO, I.P.S., FAMILY HOPE and others
MULLIS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
BRENT MULLIS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOKE v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA COOKE
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRENT MILLER, CHIEF DEPUTY BRADLEY SHEPHERD, JAIL COMMANDER BRADLEY SEACAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIS v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent:
T. PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEDEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO PEDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CHIEF RANDAL TAYLOR, OFFICER BRENT TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAXEY v. POTTER et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
VANCE GERALD MAXEY
Defendant:
BRENT POTTER, DOYLE & FOUTTY, U S BANK N A and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEVIL v. WILSON et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN M. NEVIL
Defendant:
LAURRE B. WILSON, BRENT M. MACER and JILLIAN N. KRATOCHVIL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception of Wire or Oral Communications
SWALLERS v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2023cv02103
Petitioner:
BRENT SWALLERS
Respondent:
GERALD COLEMAN and RANDALL TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowden v. Walmart Inc.
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Brent Rowden
Defendant:
WALMART, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MULLIS v. LANE
as 1:2023cv01516
Petitioner:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
