Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BEST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25181
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BEST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brian Best v. Virgil Smith, et al
as 22-16809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN BEST
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGIL SMITH
Defendant:
SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, a Sonoma County Sheriff Deputy, SONOMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and others
BEST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03914
Defendant:
AERO HOLDING LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03193
Plaintiff:
PHILIP CALLIGAN, ASHLEY RIVERA, JAMES P. MCCOOL and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alexander et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02174
Plaintiff:
Philip Calligan, Ashley Rivera, James P. McCool and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Best v. Sonoma County Sheriffs Department
as 4:2019cv02252
Defendant:
Sonoma County Sheriffs Department
Plaintiff:
Brian Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Beresford et al
as 3:2018cv00554
Defendant:
Detective Sam Hatley and Meridith Beresford
Plaintiff:
Brian Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOSTED v. VARGO et al
as 5:2016cv04869
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SHOSTED
Defendant:
MATTHEW A. VARGO , BRIAN BEST , TALDEN M. CASHATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
International Intellectual Management Corporation v. Profess Oriental Rugs et al
as 2:2007cv06402
Plaintiff:
International Intellectual Management Corporation, International Intellectual Management Corporation and International Intellectual Management Corporation
Defendant:
Profess Oriental Rugs, 4 Season Handbag, 12 Home Linen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
