Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
JETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02479
Defendant: 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: BRIAN JETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Perales v. United States Government, et al
as 16-50094
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD PERALES
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ILLUMINATI, Super-Rich and others
Currie v. Jett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv03160
Petitioner: Tony Currie
Respondent: Brian Jett and M. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ho v. Jett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2013cv00245
Plaintiff: Eric Ho
Defendant: Brian Jett , Harley G. Lappin , Paul M. Laird and others
Ho v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2012cv00126
Plaintiff: Eric Ho
Defendant: United States of America, Brian Jett, Federal Employees of the BOP and/or FMC-Rochester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVito v. City Of San Jose et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv03225
Plaintiff: Evan DeVito
Defendant: City Of San Jose, Brian Jett and Tim Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar v. Warden Brian Jett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1642
Plaintiff - Appellant: Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar
Defendant - Appellee: Warden Brian Jett
Akbar v. Jett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2010cv04493
Plaintiff: Muhammad Akbar
Defendant: Brian Jett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad Akbar v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 10-1741
Petitioner - Appellant: Muhammad Jalal-Deem Akbar
Respondent - Appellee: U.S. Parole Commission and Warden Brian Jett, FMC Rochester
Charles Franklin v. Brian Jett
as 09-4020
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES FRANKLIN
Respondent - Appellee: BRIAN JETT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?