Cases 21 - 30 of 30
CONAWAY v. MILLER et al
as 2:2012cv01791
Plaintiff:
HERBERT D. CONAWAY
Defendant:
BRIAN MILLER, MICHAEL ZAVADA, CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FERENCZ v. MEDLOCK et al
as 2:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
SHANNON FERENCZ
Defendant:
LARRY MEDLOCK, BRIAN MILLER, GEARY O'NEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEVENS v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv01131
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STEVENS
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY , PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. , CAROL YOUNKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRIN v. MEDLOCK et al
as 2:2011cv01006
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL CURRIN
Defendant:
LARRY MEDLOCK, BARRY CROFTCHECK, TIMMIE BURNSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myatt v. Lamwas et al
as 3:2011cv01328
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Myatt
Defendant:
Lamwas, Gary Sowash, Franklin J. Tennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2011cv02484
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MILLER
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ANDERSON and WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Winston v. Tom Riel, et al
as 10-3806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WINSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM RIEL, Mayor, Public Affairs & Police, ROSS VEIDICH, City Councilman for public safety, MIKE CLOSE, Chief of City Police and others
RADCLIFF v. MILLER et al
as 2:2010cv00554
Plaintiff:
JESSY L. RADCLIFF
Defendant:
BRIAN MILLER, LESKINEN and JEFFREY A. BEARD, PH.D
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Sniezek
as 1:2010cv00061
Petitioner:
John Brian Miller
Respondent:
T.L. Sniezek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WINSTON v. RIEL et al
as 1:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WINSTON
Defendant:
TOM RIEL, ROSS VEIDICH, MIKE CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
