Cases 61 - 70 of 91
O'BRIEN v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv01246
Plaintiff:
ROCKY O'BRIEN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BRIAN THOMPSON, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT MANAGER MICHAEL MAHLMEISTER, MAJOR OF THE GUARD DAVID ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COWDER v. THOMPSON
as 3:2012cv00161
Petitioner:
MARK COWDER
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Reed v. Craig Harpster, et al
as 12-3212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM REED
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG HARPSTER, Unit Manager, JEFFERY ROCKOVAN, Grievance Coordinator, JAMES D. MORRIS, Major and others
COWDER v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2012cv00109
Petitioner:
MARK COWDER
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON , CLEARFIELD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Welch v. Thompson
as 3:2012cv00933
Petitioner:
James Welch
Respondent:
Brian Thompson and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luis Alamo, et al v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-2134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS E. ALAMO and RITA C. SABELLI-ALAMO
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, BRIAN THOMPSON, ROBERT MARSH and others
Fakhouri v. Thompson et al
as 1:2012cv00756
Petitioner:
Zouheir Saul Fakhouri
Respondent:
Brian Thompson, Bruce Disarro and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv01238
Petitioner:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al
as 2:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
James Michael Morgan
Defendant:
Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, Barbara Broderick, Rochelle Harlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig McDaniels v. Brian Thompson, et al
as 12-1374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG MCDANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC R. LINHARDT, BRIAN THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
