Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Waiton v. City of Rohnert Park et al
as 3:2013cv03759
Plaintiff:
Thomas David Waiton
Defendant:
City of Rohnert Park, County of Sonoma, James, Melanie, Rhris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Key v. Gombar et al
as 2:2013cv01623
Plaintiff:
Willie Earl Key
Defendant:
Nicholas Gombar, Benjamin Zamora, Jaime Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waiton v. Post et al
as 3:2013cv02439
Plaintiff:
Thomas David Waiton
Defendant:
Kerri Post, Brian Wood, Doris Maxine Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whaley v. Wood et al
as 1:2011cv00577
Defendant:
Brian Wood , McCall Police Department , City of McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney T Whaley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Moore, et al v. Chase Bank USA, et al
as 11-80125
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHAEL E. MOORE, CHRISTIAN LOVIN, SCOTT MILLER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CHASE BANK USA and CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
In Re: Chase Bank USA, N.A. "Check Loan" Contract Litigation
as 3:2009md02032
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Moore, Diane M. Rooney, Christian Lovin and others
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, Chase Issuance Trust, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. and others
Interested Party:
Gregory P. Scialdone
Not Classified By Court:
Elizabeth A Miller and Mr Gregory P Scialdone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Wood, et al
as 3:2009cv00554
Plaintiff:
George W. Wright
Defendant:
Brian Wood and Auto Acquisition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
