Cases 1 - 10 of 259
James Cuyler v. Charles Wilson, et al
as 24-11219
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. CUYLER
Defendant:
CHARLES R. WILSON, WILLIAM H. PRYOR, JR., ADALBERTO JORDAN and others
Ettorre v. York County et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Elaine Ettorre
Defendant:
York County, David L. Lash, Erika Eiker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuyler v. Wilson et al
as 8:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
James M. Cuyler
Defendant:
Charles R. Wilson, William H. Pryor, Jr., Adalberto Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Britt v. Nueces County
as 24-40096
Plaintiff:
Kristi Kesel Britt
Defendant:
Nueces County, James D. Granberry, In his official capacity and Nueces County District Attorney's Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hope v. Brady et al
as 7:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
Antonio DeVonne Hope, Sr
Defendant:
James Brady, Cecilia Quirindongo, Victoria Ann Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Britt v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Kristi Kesel Britt
Defendant:
Nueces County, James D. Granberry and Nueces County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Brooks et al
as 8:2023cv02735
Plaintiff:
Garrett Cook and Garrett M. Cook
Defendant:
Michael Brooks, Mark Dainty, Dina Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Britt v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv08326
Plaintiff:
Rodney Britt
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
