Cases 1 - 10 of 420
Brooks v. Hawkins County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Dallas Dunn, Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie Ray Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Perkins
as 2:2024cv02605
Defendant:
Jennifer Perkins
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatley v. Brook et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
Officer Sed Brook and Sgt. Churchwell
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Hatley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson, Mark v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2024cv02532
Defendant:
Damon K. Griffin, John T. Fowlkes and Nathan P. Brooks
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Brooks
as 2:2024cv02526
Defendant:
Barry S. Brooks
Plaintiff:
Sandra Houston
Unknown:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hamm et al v. Wood et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Dr. Biju Oommen, Dr. Christopher Lockhart and W. Mark Hamm
Defendant:
Brooks Wood, Helpp Incorporated and Dr. Harvey Castro
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Brooks v. USA
as 1:2024cv00244
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jermaine Cortez Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
v. Claiborne County, TN et al
as 3:2024cv00295
Defendant:
Bob Brooks, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Claiborne County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Pauline Buchanan and David Davis
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Sheriff Bob Brooks, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reed v. TDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00291
Defendant:
Christopher Carroll, Tennessee Department of Corrections, John Doe, 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
