Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Turner v. Warden Crabtree et al
as 5:2023cv01683
Plaintiff:
Carlos Jerome Turner
Defendant:
Warden Crabtree, Lt. Jeremy Pelze, Bryan McPhail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Standfield v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv01319
Petitioner:
Timothy Bryan Standfield
Respondent:
Asst Warden Joesph Headley and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucious v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Kendarius Devan Lucious
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Larry McCovery, Officer Thoggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Gordy et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Larry McCovery and Bryan Gavins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. McCovery et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Larry McCovery, Christopher Gordy and Bryan Gavins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Whitfield, et al
as 2:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Anderson
Defendant:
Lt. Whitfield, Bryan Moore, Kenneth Noe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Whitfield et al
as 2:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Anderson
Defendant:
Whitfield, Bryan Moore, Kenneth Noe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
