Cases 11 - 20 of 946
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Jimmy Smith, Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bostice v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Bostice
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Officer Henry Adams, Doctor Farly Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Eric J.R. Nichols, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ross Massey
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reedy v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Charles Reedy
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Collier - TDCJ Director
as 6:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Tracy Lynn Jackson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohsin Syed v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
