Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03145
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cox et al v. Roblox Corporation et al
as 3:2025cv10272
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cox and J.C.
Defendant:
Roblox Corporation, Epic Games, Inc., Microsoft Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Thomas K. Litton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03908
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv04975
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Bryan Cox, Peter Theodore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COX v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20231
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jordan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv04012
Defendant:
Peter Theodore, Rocco Pruger, City Of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Elgin Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03293
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORDINGLY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03134
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COX, CLIFFORD RILEY, PETER CAROTHERS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shanley v. Cox et al
as 5:2019cv03147
Plaintiff:
Jason Kyle Tarrence Shanley
Defendant:
Rick Heinrich, Bryan Cox, David Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordingly et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02103
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cox, Clifford Riley, Peter Carothers and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
