Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Bryant et al v. Wilder et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Bryant and Ann W.E. Bryant
Defendant:
Kimberly Wilder, David Wilder and Attorney Matthew Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bryant v. Rauls et al
as 1:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Celesta Bryant
Defendant:
Michael Rauls and Annett Holdings, Inc. doing business as TMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Slone v. Perry County Fiscal Court et al
as 6:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Slone
Defendant:
Perry County Fiscal Court, Robby Slone, Deputy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al vs 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Network Supply, 3M Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Adams, Alice Adams, Edward Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Bryant v. Hickman et al
as 3:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Bryant
Defendant:
Hon. Charles R. Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skaggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Bryant Skaggs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Oldson v. Burnett et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Christopher Oldson
Defendant:
Col. Phillip Burnett, Jr., Lt. Col. Michael Rogers, Major Darren Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Bryant Duane Griffin
Respondent:
Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. USA
as 6:2023cv00079
Petitioner:
Bryant Duane Griffin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
