Cases 31 - 40 of 180
BURCH et al v. USA TRUCK, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv09575
Plaintiff:
JACLYN M. BURCH and MARK E. BURCH
Defendant:
USA TRUCK, INC. , FRANK CANAFINO , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burch v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05892
Plaintiff:
Linda Sue Burch
Defendant:
WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS INC and PFIZER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURCH v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv08413
Plaintiff:
JAMES BURCH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
APONTE et al v. BAYER CORP., et al
as 2:2016cv03769
Plaintiff:
JAMMIE APONTE , APRIL ARLOTTA , ELLEN BENNETT and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, KBR, Inc., Halliburton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06153
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURCH v. KERESTES et al
as 1:2015cv00094
Petitioner:
JOSEPH W. BURCH
Respondent:
JOHN R. KERESTES, KATHLEEN KANE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
