Cases 1 - 10 of 575
DAVIS v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS and CHRISTOPHER HORTEN
Defendant:
R QUINN, C HORTEN, K EMMIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Burdette et al
as 2:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Robbie Collins
Defendant:
Samantha Burdette, Nurse Driver and Dr. McCree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanley v. Palmer et al
as 5:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Samuri Stanley
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, EHSO John Doe, Captain Bibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Givens v. Palmer et al
as 9:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Givens
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, Stanley Terry, Heifiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-317
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
American Express Company v. Oliver
as 24-238
Petitioner:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY OLIVER, TERRY GAYLE QUINTON, SHAWN O'KEEFE and others
Blair v. Illiou et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Blair
Defendant:
John Illiou, Stephen M. Orsetti, Chad Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burdette v. Acosta et al
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Vicky Burdette
Defendant:
Christopher Acosta and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MACK v. BURDETT et al
as 3:2023cv24736
Plaintiff:
DEREK J MACK
Defendant:
BURDETT and BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingle, Jr. v. Palmer et al
as 9:2023cv06106
Plaintiff:
Henry O'neal Dingle, Jr.
Defendant:
John Palmer, Mrs. S. Burdette, Mr. Wilkenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
