Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Wu et al v. U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 1:2021cv00467
Defendant:
Gregory Collett, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services
Plaintiff:
Minjiong Wu and Jin Ying
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BROWN v. MICHAEL, et al
as 2:2020cv00520
Defendant:
John Dose 1-10, U.S. INS NNJ, Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Laverne Brown
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Jin et al v. U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 1:2019cv03214
Defendant:
Mr. Gregory Collett, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services
Plaintiff:
Ms. Ying Jin and Mr. Victor H. Sparrow, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv10109
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10109
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
JUSTE v. BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv00711
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant:
BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and SALLY QUILLIAN YATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
