Cases 41 - 50 of 1,820
Hernandez v. Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 3:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez Hernandez
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 1:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Pittman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. BOP
as 4:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Smith
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malachowski v. USA
as 23-10426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcel Malachowski
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Billy Keith, Warden, FCI Big Spring and others
West v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-30353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Joseph West, Individually and on behalf of J F W
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Lugo v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2023cv00523
Petitioner:
Victor Lugo
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Perez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Javier Hugo Perez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramos v. Martinez et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Sandalio Ramos
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff
as 23-10268
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent / Appellee:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Deem v. Garrido
as 23-30169
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steven Lynn Deem, also known as Steve Deem
Respondent / Appellee:
F. J. Garrido, Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
