Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ball v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03245
Plaintiff: Roslind Ball
Defendant: Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Cox v. Marlo Butler-Jones
as 21-3399
Applicant: CHRISTOPHER J. COX
Respondent: MARLO BUTLER-JONES, Warden
Cox v. Butler-Jones
as 3:2021cv03264
Petitioner: Christopher J Cox
Respondent: Marlo Butler-Jones
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUTLER-JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34691
Plaintiff: CHARLENE BUTLER-JONES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Butler-Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02189
Plaintiff: Sharonda Miller
Defendant: . Butler-Jones, . Gray, . Freed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv03264
Defendant: Kess Roberson, John Baldwin, Patrick T. Singleton and others
Plaintiff: Howard W Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv01269
Defendant: Kess Roberson, John Baldwin, Patrick T. Singleton and others
Plaintiff: Howard W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Baldwin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00732
Defendant: Connie Houston, Kess Roberson, Koontz and others
Plaintiff: Howard W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danneman v. Roberson et al
as 3:2019cv03115
Defendant: Kess Roberson, Sandra Funk, T Singleton and others
Plaintiff: Benjamin David Danneman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shackles v. Wexford Health Care Services et al
as 3:2017cv03114
Plaintiff: William Shackles
Defendant: Wexford Health Care Services, Steven Kotterman, Lisa Hopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?