Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HOOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv08085
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR C HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95069
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN C HOOPER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61886
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR C HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Clements et al
as 1:2017cv01218
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Wallace
Defendant:
Chris Clements, Wes Mayes, Karen Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hogan v. Johnson et al
as 5:2017cv01022
Plaintiff:
Brian Hogan
Defendant:
Sanford Johnson, Alex Holmes, Luther Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter, Tommie v. Hooper, Patrick et al
as 3:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
Tommie L. Carter
Defendant:
Patrick C. Hooper and Brent H. Exner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapin et al v. Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc. et al
as 1:2015mc22386
Plaintiff:
Cary Chapin, Barbara Douma, John Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Great Southern Wood Preserving, Inc., The Putnam Lumber & Export Company and Putnam Family Properties, Inc.
Objector:
Dantzler, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Hernandez v. Wofford et al
as 1:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Henry Aquayo Hernandez
Defendant:
Wofford, Robin Larse, N. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 8:2015cv00706
Plaintiff:
Carmichael T Flowers
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of , South Carolina Dept of Corr , Bryan P Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Wofford et al
as 1:2015cv00616
Plaintiff:
Henry Aquayo Hernandez
Defendant:
Wofford, Robin Larse, N. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
