Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Long v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al.
as 24-1557
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. LONG
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cockrum et al v. C H Murphy/Clark-Ullman Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01515
Defendant:
Howmet Aerospace Inc, C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman Inc, Arconic Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Cockrum and Donna Cockrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
RIVERA v. EDELEN et al
as 4:2020cv00189
Defendant:
MARK INCH, C A MURPHY, R ROGERS and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT F RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. MOCK et al
as 4:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DICKERSON, JR
Defendant:
A R MOCK , C A MURPHY , G HENDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. McNeil et al
as 5:2015ct03284
Plaintiff:
Tori Jarel Neal
Defendant:
C/O McNeil, C/O Murphy, C. Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Parker v. Moses Jackson, III
as 14-2565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Parker
Defendant - Appellee:
Moses Jackson, III, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
DefensTech International, Inc. v. C & W Murphy and Associates et al
as 8:2014cv00277
Defendant:
C & W Murphy and Associates and William J Murphy
Plaintiff:
DefensTech International, Inc.
Clark v. Sgt. Vrakas et al
as 1:2013cv06300
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Clark
Defendant:
Sgt. Vrakas and C/O Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STALEY v. TUCKER
as 4:2012cv00471
Plaintiff:
NEGUESSE P STALEY
Defendant:
KENNETH S TUCKER , C HALLEY, S HERRING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Stalnaker et al
as 3:2012cv00424
Defendant:
Dr. Cain, C/O Connolly, C/O Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Armond Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
