Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thomas v. Walji et al
as 3:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Cortney C Thomas
Defendant:
Khudabuksh K. Walji, Law Office of K. Walji, Esq., P.C., Law Office of Justin Guenley PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gutierrez v. Mansur, et al.
as 7:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mark Gutierrez
Defendant:
Attorney at Law Bret Mansur, Attorney at Law Matt C. Thomas, Bret Mansur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Winnett et al v. Frank et al
as 1:2020cv01155
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott, Candace Horton, Susan Jacobson Bailey and others
Defendant:
Amari C. Thomas, NPC, Miles Griffin, NP, Cullen Andrew Herbert, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cledera v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv01997
Defendant:
United States, RING (Amazon Inc), Charles Edge and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul M Cledera and Robert Paul Magtulis Cledera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Thomas et al
as 3:2019cv01355
Defendant:
David Hobden, Vincent Timmons, DART and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley A Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03474
Plaintiff:
Joyce A. Thomas and William C. Thomas
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 4:2010cv00472
Plaintiff:
Donald C Thomas
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
