Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Anderson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C Anderson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1984
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anderson v. Nutra Pure, LLC
as 1:2023cv00008
Defendant:
Nutra Pure, LLC doing business as CBDPure also known as CBD Pure and CBD Pure
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
Samantha C. Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rufus Anderson v. J. A. Piper Roofing Co.
as 20-2221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS J. C. ANDERSON, a/k/a Rufus Julius C. Anderson, a/k/a Rufus Julius Corneliu Anderson, formerly #165323
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. PIPER ROOFING COMPANY
Defendant:
GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM
Rufus Anderson v. Greenville Health System
as 19-1322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS J. C. ANDERSON, a/k/a Rufus Julius C. Anderson, a/k/a Rufus J. Anderson
Defendant / Appellee:
GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Farley v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00643
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Officer John Doe, Kevin McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Farley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farley v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00634
Defendant:
Officer Doe #5, Lt. Booker, V. Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Farley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Jackson et al
as 5:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Anderson
Defendant:
Gerald McK. Jackson and Mail Contractors of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
