Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Robertson v. Nix et al
as 3:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Toby Nix, Lenn Wood, Laura Camper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Clayton v. United States
as 19-3390
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andrew C. Clayton
Terry Johnson v. James Clayton, et al
as 19-2419
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES C. CLAYTON, GREGG SCOTT and ERIC KUNKEL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY C. JOHNSON
Clayton v. USA
as 2:2019cv04060
Petitioner:
Andrew C. Clayton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CLAYTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv01335
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC")
Plaintiff:
NANCY C. CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Bowman et al
as 2:2018cv00979
Defendant:
Officer E. Bowman, Officer C. Clayton, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckel et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04247
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Beckel and Allen M Barnard
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Erik Kunkle, C Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04175
Plaintiff:
Phillip Sanchez
Defendant:
James T Dimas, Herbert Caskey, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermaine Carpenter v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 17-2376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE D. CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, ERIC KUNKELL, JAMES C. CLAYTON and others
Thomas Powers v. Thomas Schanzle-Haskins
as 17-2249
Petitioner:
THOMAS POWERS
Respondent:
THOMAS P. SCHANZLE-HASKINS
Party-in-Interest:
JAMES C. CLAYTON, JOSEPH HANKINS, GREGG SCOTT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
