Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Nathan Floyd v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13482
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN C. FLOYD
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
BENBOW et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BENBOW, JOSEPH BILANDZIJA, GENE E. BILDERBACK and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
(PC) Craver v. Floyd
as 2:2020cv02327
Plaintiff:
Andre Ramon Craver
Defendant:
C. Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pasco County)
as 8:2020cv01431
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Nathan C. Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Floyd v. Olson et al
as 3:2020cv00515
Defendant:
Gibson, Bachusz, Gowan and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Melvin C Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93249
Plaintiff:
VINCENT C FLOYD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Floyd, Jr. v. Scott Frakes
as 19-3304
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner / Appellant:
William C. Floyd, Jr.
Floyd et al v. West et al
as 4:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Mary West, Jason Williams and Austin Swing
Plaintiff:
Jeremy S Smith, Joshua Bailey, Joshua C Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSHALL v. WGL HOLDINGS, INC., et al
as 1:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARSHALL
Defendant:
WGL HOLDINGS, INC., MICHAEL D. BARNES, GEORGE P. CLANCY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
JACKSON v. WGL HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00530
Plaintiff:
LISA JACKSON
Defendant:
WGL HOLDINGS INC. , MICHAEL D. BARNES , GEORGE P. CLANCY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
