Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Gilbert (PS) v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
Jerome C. Gilbert, Jr. and Jerome Corneilius Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
Natasha Jackson, First Stop Bail Bonds, Dora, Colorado Division Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert (PS) v. Douglas County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv02151
Plaintiff:
Jerome C. Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas County District Attorney's Office, Douglas County Sheriff's Office, Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Kiser et al
as 7:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Gary Wall
Defendant:
Lt. J. Kiser, A. Gallihar, W. Swiney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. UNITED CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
DARION JOSEPH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
UNITED CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES and RONALD C. GILBERT, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gilbert v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01095
Petitioner:
Jerome C. Gilbert
Respondent:
Dean Williams, Mark Fairbarin, Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert v. Cobos et al
as 7:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Reginald C Gilbert
Defendant:
Judge David Cobos, Investigator Bobby Neil and Midland County Pretrial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Ramey et al
as 7:2021cv00348
Defendant:
A. Duncan, Fleming, #1 Doe Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
as 1:2021cv00318
Defendant:
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
Plaintiff:
LORI C. GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Gilbert v. Bergami
as 3:2020cv00144
Respondent:
Thomas Bergami
Petitioner:
Reginald Christopher Gilbert and Reginald C. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
