Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Miller v. Lee et al
as 6:2026cv01715
Plaintiff:
Theodore Miller
Defendant:
Aaron M. Lee, Benjamin Wood and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MILLER et al v. AMERICAN ECONOMY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2026cv05668
Plaintiff:
JOYCE MILLER and MARK MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN ECONOMY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chisholm, Jr. v. Garza et al
as 3:2026cv02261
Plaintiff:
Leandra M. Chisholm, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Garza, Lieutenant Beck, Correctional Officer Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gogidze et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2026cv04819
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Gogidze and Koba Bukia
Defendant:
Robert L. Miller and R.J. Schinner Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Miller v. Rutkauskas et al
as 3:2026cv00164
Plaintiff:
Parthia Miller
Defendant:
Tomas Rutkauskas and JLKS Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Foucha v. Martuscello III et al
as 1:2026cv01656
Petitioner:
Lesean Foucha
Respondent:
Daniel F. Martuscello III and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRODHEAD v. DAVIDSON COUNTY et al
as 1:2026cv00772
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN T. BRODHEAD
Defendant:
DAVIDSON COUNTY, JUDGE MARY F. COVINGTON, TIMOTHY D. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bencomo v. Miller
as 6:2026cv01653
Plaintiff:
Josue Bencomo
Defendant:
Doctor Heidi Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
