Cases 21 - 30 of 39
McAnarney et al v. C & Y Construction Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv12229
Plaintiff:
Barry C. McAnarney , Massachusetts Laborers' Health and Welfare Fund , Massachusetts Laborers' Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
C & Y Construction Co. Inc.
Trustee:
Enterprise Bank and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Cordell Anderson v. C. Tampkin
as 12-57152
Petitioner - Appellant:
CORDELL H. ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
C. Y. TAMPKINS, Warden, California Rehabilitation Center
Michael Ermitano v. C. Y. Tampkin
as 12-56524
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD ERMITANO, AKA Michael E. Ermitano
Respondent - Appellee:
C. Y. TAMPKINS, Warden
Michael Edward Ermitano v. C.Y. Tampkins
as 5:2012cv00714
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Ermitano
Respondent:
C. Y. Tampkins
Ermitano v. Tampkins
as 3:2012cv00876
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Ermitano
Respondent:
C. Y. Tampkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridgewater v. Dekalb County et al
as 3:2011cv05352
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Hamilton, George and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bridgewater v. Dekalb County et al
as 3:2011mc80265
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater
Defendant:
Dekalb County, John Doe, Hamilton and others
Howell v. Over The Ditch Cafe LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00876
Plaintiff:
C Y Howell
Defendant:
Over The Ditch Cafe LLC, Mary Lein and Ronald Rabold
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Y. et al v. Department of Education, State of Hawaii
as 1:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
C. Y. and Cheryl Y.
Defendant:
Department of Education, State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Dillon et al v. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Dillon, Wilkie F. Dillon, Ceola Kennedy and others
Defendant:
Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
