Cases 1 - 10 of 2,940
Ayala-Calderon v. Garland
as 24-3026
Petitioner:
ULISES AYALA-CALDERON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kory, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2946
Plaintiff:
PIERRE KORY, M.D., LE TRINH HOANG, D.O., BRIAN TYSON, M.D. and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, REJI VARGHESE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and ERIKA CALDERON, in her official capacity as Executive Officer of the Osteopathic Medical Board of California
Gutierrez-Calderon v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Yesika Gutierrez-Calderon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(PC) Calderon v. Covello
as 2:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Defendant:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Gerardo Garcia, Jr.
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gerardo Calderon Garcia, Jr., also known as Gerardo Culderon Garcia
Calderon, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2729
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO ESPINDOLA CALDERON and CARMELINA MARTINEZ GARCIA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Calderone, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
Don Calderone, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alberto Calderon v. Garland
as 24-2619
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO CALDERON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
