Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09451
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv12456
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Clark v. AIG Property Casualty Company et al
as 1:2026cv06216
Defendant:
Kate Stith, Donna Hae Kyun Lee, AIG Property Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff:
La'Shaun Clark
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Anthony Siriani, et al v. David Feingold, et al
as 26-13214
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SIRIANI, LORI SIRIANI, GRACE CICCONE and others
Defendant:
DAVID J. FEINGOLD, FEINGOLD LLC, FEINGOLD MORGAN SANCHEZ, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (a) Writ of Mandamus
Ducler v. Republic of Argentina
as 26-2334
Defendant:
FABIAN RODRIGUEZ SIMON, A.k.a Pepn, REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, JOHN DOES 110, INDIVIDUALS ACTING UNDER COLOR OF FOREIGN LAW and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN MANUEL DUCLER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
