Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Kelly v. Bennett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant:
Lt. Bennett, Joseph H. Headley and Warden Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cargill v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08022
Petitioner:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanders v. Cargill
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Mario Demond Sanders
Defendant:
Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettway et al v. R L Zeigler Co Inc et al
as 7:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Hazel Pettway, Walter Knox, Archie K Elliott and others
Defendant:
R L Zeigler Co Inc, RL Ziegler Company Inc, Money Purchase Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Woodall v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
as 4:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
David Woodall
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
Intervenor:
Byrd Maintenance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cargill v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv08002
Petitioner:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cargill v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv08024
Petitioner:
Quincetta Y Cargill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cargill v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y. Cargill
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
