Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Terrence Bressi v. Pima County Board of Superviso, et al
as 22-15123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee:
PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARK NAPIER, Pima County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Former Pima County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00749
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03172
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arshdeep Singh v. USDHS, et al
as 20-55250
Respondent / Appellee:
CARLA L. PROVOST, Chief, U.S. CBP, DONNA P. CAMPAGNOLO, District Director, Los Angeles District Office, U.S. CIS, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARSHDEEP SINGH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01717
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01291
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv00165
Respondent:
Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Lory C. Torres, Kenneth Smith and others
Petitioner:
Nirvair Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00142
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00006
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
