Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis v. Does
as 2:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
James Edward Carlos Davis
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Dennis et al
as 4:2023cv04076
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamont Reynolds
Defendant:
Ex-Chief of Police Orlando Dennis and The City of Stamps, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Thompson et al
as 4:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Carlos Montana Williamson
Defendant:
Daisha Thompson and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities-Employment
Smith v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ralph Joe Smith
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Charles Hendrix, Toni Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana v. Messensmith et al
as 4:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cameron Carlos Santana
Defendant:
Messensmith, Victoria Scott, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scharnhorst v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2022cv05243
Plaintiff:
John William Scharnhorst, III
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, Captain Nolan Ake, Sergeant Carlos Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal et al
as 2:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Debbie Heathcock
Defendant:
Speed Intermodal, Srikanth Vangala, Freedom 1 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Phillips v. Rocha et al
as 2:2022cv02181
Plaintiff:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Michael Myers, Leon Philpot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
