Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benitez v. Del Toro, et al.
as 24-1311
Plaintiff:
RODRIGO BENITEZ
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy and DOES, 1-25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
William Jones v. Carlos Del Toro
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVID JONES
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jerry Lamb v. Carlos Del Toro
as 23-1505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY GORALSKI LAMB
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRENCE O'CONNELL and others
Dennis Brewer v. Christopher Wray, et al
as 23-5052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dennis Sheldon Brewer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, Mr.; Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kimberly Cheatle, Ms.; Director, United States Secret Service, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Mr.; Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Donald Simmons, et al v. Carlos Del Toro
as 23-55201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD SIMMONS, JAMES TRIPLETT, THERREL GATLING and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD SPENCER, Secretary of the Navy, THOMAS B. MODLY, Secretary of the Navy, THOMAS HARKER, Secretary of The Navy and others
Lamar Forbes v. Carlos Del Toro, et al
as 23-5012
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lamar A. Forbes
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas W. Harker, Secretary of the Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy and Randall Lamoureux, President, Naval Clemency and Parole Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
