Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lowe v. Schnell
as 0:2022cv01386
Petitioner:
Michael Carlton Lowe
Respondent:
Commissioner Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prouty v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv02437
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, All current DHS-MSOP employees, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. St. Louis County District Court et al
as 0:2021cv02253
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
St. Louis County District Court, Erok Skon, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. St. Louis County District Court et al
as 0:2021cv02251
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
St. Louis County District Court, Eric Skon, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2021cv02252
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
Jodie Harpstead, St. Louis County Court, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. United States Navy et al
as 0:2021cv02184
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
United States Navy and Carlton County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. St. Louis County District Court et al
as 0:2021cv02137
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
St. Louis County District Court, Erok Skon, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2021cv02099
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, St. Louis County & Court, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Sr v. Carlton County
as 0:2021cv01567
Plaintiff:
Dale A Williams Sr
Defendant:
Carlton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
