Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DUNCAN-CARMONA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2021cv03400
Plaintiff:
ALLIYAH DUNCAN-CARMONA, CHANEL DUNCAN-HARDING and LONDON DUNCAN HARDING
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garanin et al v. City of Scranton et al
as 3:2019cv01275
Defendant:
Patrick L. Hinton, Lori Uher, Tamilyn Carmona and others
Plaintiff:
Rock Property Holdings LLC, Ferndrive LLC, Vsevolod Garanin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARMONA v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv01752
Plaintiff:
QUETCY Y. CARMONA
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SCOTT v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
GERALD MAY, CARMONA, COFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUANG v. INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv00740
Plaintiff:
JIANMIN HUANG
Defendant:
INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ANTHONY P. ZOOK, JOSE CARMONA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PEPICELLI v. INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv00341
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PEPICELLI
Defendant:
INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ANTHONY P. ZOOK, JOSE CARMONA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
SANTANA v. BETTS
as 2:2015cv04226
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN SANTANA
Defendant:
PERRY BETTS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBB-HAYE v. MACLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2015cv04278
Plaintiff:
ROBIN COBB-HAYE
Defendant:
MS. MACLAUGHLIN, LINDA RENICK, ROBERT DAYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELVILA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02521
Plaintiff:
JUAN DELVILA , JUAN SOLER , TONY MASON and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
