Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Byrd et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01362
Plaintiff:
Michael Byrd and Carol Byrd
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Killebrew v. Davidson et al
as 1:2010cv01703
Plaintiff:
Shirley Killebrew
Defendant:
Lisa Davidson, Carol Byrd, Family Medicine at Lowry, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Billy French v. Daviess County, Kentucky, et al
as 09-5983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY JOSEPH FRENCH, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVIESS COUNTY, KENTUCKY, DAVID OSBORNE, Individually, and in his official capacity as the Daviess County Jailer, JOHN AND JANE DOES, NOS. 1, 2, AND 3, Individually and in their official capacity as officers and employees of the Daviess County Detention Center and others
Byrd et al v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania et al
as 2:2009cv05761
Plaintiff:
Richard Byrd, Richard Byrd, Carole Byrd and others
Defendant:
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company and Lexington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilkey v. Adams et al
as 5:2007cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Wilkey
Defendant:
Bill Adams, McCracken County Jail, City of Paducah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Osborne et al
as 4:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Carrillo, Sr.
Defendant:
David Osborne, Carol Byrd, Vickie Isom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
