Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Black v. Sabol et al
as 4:2009cv40115
Petitioner:
Michael Black
Respondent:
Carolyn A. Sabol, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wattleton v. Sabol
as 1:2009cv01590
Petitioner:
David Earl Wattleton
Respondent:
Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Leja v. Sabol, et al
as 09-1719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. LEJA
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN A. SABOL, Warden, FMC Devens, SANDRA HOWARD, Medical Director FMC Devens, C. BEAM, MD, Physician, FMC Devens and others
Defendant:
DAVID WINN, former Warden, FMC Devens and BRIAN HERTEL, Assistant Warden, FMC Devens
Jones v. Sabol
as 09-1657
Petitioner - Appellant:
REORN M. JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROLYN A. SABOL
Robert Gadson v. Jeff Grondolsky, et al
as 09-1644
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT V. GADSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROLYN A. SABOL and JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Respondent:
JOHN D. COLAUTTI, Record Office Manager and UNITED STATES
Brown v. Sabol
as 09-1569
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN L. BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROLYN A. SABOL
Bonadonna v. Sabol
as 4:2009cv40081
Petitioner:
Philip A. Bonadonna
Respondent:
Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kamal v. Sabol
as 09-1340
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM DAVID KAMAL
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROLYN A. SABOL, Warden, FMC Devens
Reese-Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv40059
Petitioner:
Christopher C. Reese-Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America and Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cryar v. Sabol
as 4:2009cv40054
Petitioner:
John Garland Cryar
Respondent:
Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
