Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bess et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv03939
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bess
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Jr Ernest J Codilis, Jason Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Satterfield v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv02331
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Satterfield, Jr.
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB, Victor Vita of Vylla Home and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Love et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv05864
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Love and Cynthia Love
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03798
Plaintiff:
Dwight Davis, Howard Stanley and Stanley Howard
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, Does 1-20, John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TIPTON v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2021cv00417
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
KATRICE TIPTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Israel v. USA, et al.
as 1:2020cv06608
Respondent:
The Estate of Churchill Hunt Community Association, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Angela Israel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01849
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Payne v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 1:2020cv00276
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bryant D Payne
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
