Cases 1 - 10 of 327
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bey v. Carter-Haston et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Hanif Rahim Bey
Defendant:
Carter-Haston, Brownlee Whitlow & Praet, L. Marc Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Justin Sutton v. Rockingham County
as 23-2262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN L. SUTTON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hartwell Lanier King, Sr., BETTY K. SUTTON, Individually and JUSTIN LANIER SUTTON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hartwell Lanier King, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, TAYLOR CARTER, Individually and others
Bolovis v. The City of Charleston Fire Department et al
as 2:2023cv05902
Plaintiff:
George Bolovis
Defendant:
The City of Charleston Fire Department, Andrew Webb, William Haigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
