Cases 1 - 10 of 40
GARY v. JAMES et al
as 3:2026cv00260
Plaintiff:
BRION GARY
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, MUHAMMAD NAIJI, JON ALTEMUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-14035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
France v. France Adams et al
as 6:2025cv01437
Plaintiff:
Casey James France
Defendant:
Maureen Elizabeth France Adams and Judge Karen Adams Foxman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Emmons et al v. Gaimin AG et al
as 4:2025cv00824
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B Emmons, Fatalx3rror and JZ Dev
Defendant:
Gaimin AG, Andrew Faridani, Calvin Adamus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD NAJI, PATRICK NAGLE, WELLPATH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
WINDEL HOLMES
Defendant:
WELLPATH, RNS BRAD AVENALI, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
MCGEORGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02893
Plaintiff:
CASEY JAMES MCGEORGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STEWART v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
CASEY JAMES STEWART
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
