Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Cassell v. Umoh Firm
as 1:2023cv08454
Plaintiff:
James Cassell
Defendant:
Mr. Umoh Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fizzignolia v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv06283
Plaintiff:
JAMES FIZZIGNOLIA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, The New York City Police Department, POLICE OFFICER CASSELLS and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Correction Officers Jane Does #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cassell v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01583
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cassell
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service, Loucretia Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Colson v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Colson
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony J. Annucci, Superintendent M. Capra, Lt. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marhone v. Cassel
as 22-2912
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Conrad Marhone
Defendant / Appellee:
Correction Officer J. Cassel, Correction Officer of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Correction Officer Wright, Correction Officer at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, DSS Keysor, Deputy Superintendent at Sing Sing Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Captain Laporto, Captain at Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Lahood v. Oprihory et al
as 1:2022cv05236
Plaintiff:
George Lahood
Defendant:
Francene Oprihory, Amen Atelek, Elizabeth Broderick-Oprihory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hilton
as 22-442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Laura E. Lufkin, Aaron M. Hilton, Charles Tirone and others
Johnson v. Hilton et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Aaron M Hilton, Laura E Lufkin, Charles Tirone and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
