Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Betham et al v. Avon Products Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv04681
Plaintiff: Alexander Betham, Ms. Lynn Betham and Lynn Betham
Defendant: Avon Products Inc, ABB, Inc., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: Alfa Laval Inc. and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cross Defendant: Bayer Healthcare LLC and HAYWARD TYLER, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Elliott v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00072
Plaintiff: James E Elliott and James Edward Elliott
Defendant: John Crane, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Inc., Albany International Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Matey v. Crane Co., et al
as 8:2022cv00841
Plaintiff: Irma Matey and Richard D. Matey
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Crane Co. and others
Not Classified By Court: Jonathan Hollingshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Talarczyk et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00836
Plaintiff: FRANCIS TALARCZYK and WANDA ALGARIN TALARCZYK
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court: Jonathan C. Hollinshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Edmonds v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00825
Plaintiff: ARNOLD EDMONDS
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: Jonathan Hollingshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Grant Cochran et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv09612
Plaintiff: Grant Cochran, Charlene Cochran, Brent Cochran and others
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CRANE CO. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE COMPANY);, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Air Liquid Systems Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00519
Defendant: ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, as successor-by-merger to WHITE CONSOLDATED INDUSTRIES, as successor-by-merger to COPES VULCAN, INC., GARDNER DENVER, INC., ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Carmela Susino on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Decedent, Luciano Susino and his beneficiaries v. 3M Company
as 3:2021cv00038
Plaintiff: Carmela Susino on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Decedent, Luciano Susino and his beneficiaries
Defendant: 3M Company, VIACOMCBS Inc. (f/k/a CBS Corporation, f/k/a VIACOM, Inc. successor-by-merger with CBS Corporation f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation), a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business, Hess Oil Virgin Island Corp., a U.S. Virgin Islands Corporation with is principal place of business in New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Theron Vinson v. Covil Corporation
as 21-1297
Defendant: COVIL CORPORATION, ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THERON T. VINSON, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Kerry D. Vinson and LINDA G. VINSON
William Brock v. Covil Corporation
as 21-1298
Defendant: GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., f/k/a Aqua-Chem, Inc., d/b/a Cleaver-Brooks Division, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE Y. BROCK and WILLIAM L. BROCK
Defendant / Appellee: CBS CORPORATION, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., successor-by-merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a/k/a BF Sturtevant, a Delaware Corporation and COVIL CORPORATION
Intervenor Defendant: ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?