Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Tolbert v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv05320
Defendant:
Cook County Jail-CCJ, The City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Samuel Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv00145
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department, State Attorney at law and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Samuel Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tobert v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv04035
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Cook County Jail - CCJ, State Attorney at law and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Samuel Tobert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French-Smith v. CCJ et al
as 1:2018cv08528
Plaintiff:
Alfred French-Smith, II
Defendant:
CCJ and Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bidarka Gas Corp et al v. Merrill et al
as 5:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
Bidarka Gas Corp , Duslei Energy LLC , Jim Price Oil Co LLC and others
Defendant:
Stephen J Merrill , Karen Merrill, SBM Energy LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. CCJ
as 1:2016cv07769
Plaintiff:
VONIQUE HARRIS
Defendant:
CCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. v. diy-bike.com et al
as 0:2015cv60890
Plaintiff:
Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc.
Defendant:
diy-bike.com, fibosport.com, orge-tech.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Miller v. Cook County et al
as 1:2014cv01996
Plaintiff:
David M. Miller
Defendant:
Cook County, CCJ, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv07273
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Toni Preckwinkle, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. O'Sullivan et al
as 1:2013cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ian Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff O'Sullivan, Sheriff CCJ and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
