Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Palm Desert National Bank et al v. CDL Construction Inc et al
as 5:2012cv01429
Defendant:
CDL Construction Inc, Does, Christian D Lehuede and others
Movant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Counter Defendant:
Christian D Lehuede, Palm Desert National Bank and Roes
Plaintiff:
Palm Desert National Bank
Counter Claimant:
William E Wright
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-849
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CDL MEDICAL TECH, INC. v. US HEARTCARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2010cv01286
Plaintiff:
CDL MEDICAL TECH, INC.
Defendant:
US HEARTCARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CDL MEDICAL TECH, INC. v. MALIK
as 2:2010cv00821
Plaintiff:
CDL MEDICAL TECH, INC.
Defendant:
ISHTIAQ A. MALIK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd. et al v. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv23835
Plaintiff:
Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd., Avenue CLO Fund, Ltd., Avenue CLO II, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, HSH Nordbank AG, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Santiago et al v. CDL Hotels USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10472
Plaintiff:
Richard Santiago, William Salomon, Sujata Eyrick and others
Defendant:
CDL Hotels USA, Inc., CDL Hotels USA, Inc., CDL West 45th Street L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
John Thompson v. CDL Partners LLC
as 09-1885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CDL PARTNERS LLC
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
DON ALVIN MESSERVY
Torres v. Hilton Millennium Hotel et al
as 1:2009cv03223
Plaintiff:
Lillian Torres
Defendant:
Hilton Millennium Hotel, M&C Management Services, Ltd. and CDL Limited, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
