Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Sandra Herrera, et al v. Pierce County
as 09-35884
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SANDRA HERRERA, CECIL DAVIS, SHANNON DELANEY, a juvenile, by her next friend and mother and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PIERCE COUNTY
Pierce County v. USDCSEA
as 09-73161
:
In re: PIERCE COUNTY
Petitioner:
PIERCE COUNTY
Respondent:
USDC, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
SANDRA HERRERA, CECIL DAVIS, SHANNON DELANEY and others
Davis v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv01194
Plaintiff:
Rachel Davis and Cecil Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv03263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv02957
Plaintiff:
Cecil Davis
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gibson v. Buss et al
as 3:2007cv00285
Plaintiff:
Lionel Gibson
Defendant:
Eddie Buss, J David Donahue, Gilbert Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. BUSS et al
as 2:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
LIONEL GIBSON
Defendant:
EDDIE BUSS, J. DAVID DONAHUE, GILBERT PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Davis et al
as 3:2007cv00205
Plaintiff:
Ellis Romeoo Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Cecil Davis, Edward Buss, Dawn Buss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Daniels et al
as 3:2007cv00104
Plaintiff:
Marlin Williams
Defendant:
Mitch Daniels, James Donahue, Steve Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Davis
as 2:2007cv00040
Petitioner:
Argelio Gonzales
Respondent:
Cecil Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
