Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Johnson v. IBIS Styles Hotel, et al
as 22-2601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
IBIS STYLES HOTEL, MISS RODRIGUEZ, ANDREA EADDY and others
Robert Johnson v. IBIS Styles Hotel, et al
as 22-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
IBIS STYLES HOTEL, MISS RODRIGUEZ, ANDREA EADDY and others
JOHNSON v. IBIS STYLES HOTEL et al
as 2:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
IBIS STYLES HOTEL, MISS RODRIGUEZ, ANDREA EADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOX CHASE MEDICAL CENTER RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, PC v. ELITE IMAGING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv04381
Plaintiff:
FOX CHASE MEDICAL CENTER RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, PC
Defendant:
ELITE IMAGING CORPORATION , DELAWARE OPEN MRI RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, PA and WILKES-BARRE IMAGING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETROSKEY et al v. GRANT et al
as 1:2014cv01735
Plaintiff:
KYLE PETROSKEY and JAMIE PETROSKEY
Defendant:
DAVID C GRANT and CENTER RADIOLOGY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOSHIBA AMERICA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. v. TSIC ACQUISITION, L.P. et al
as 2:2010cv07017
Plaintiff:
TOSHIBA AMERICA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
TSIC ACQUISITION, L.P., TSIC ACQUISITION GP, INC., MICHAEL R. CLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donald Zappley, Sr. v. Robert Sharfenberg, et al
as 09-2098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD W. ZAPPLEY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SHARFENBERG, M.D. and VETERAN MEDICAL CENTER RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT
Zappley v. Sharfenberg et al
as 2:2008fp00275
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Zappley, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert Sharfenberg and Veteran Medical Center Radiology Department
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
