Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Keenan Wilkins v. USDC-SAC
as 23-70177
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KEENAN G. WILKINS, PAUL GONZALEZ, S. PULLEY and others
Petitioner:
KEENAN G. WILKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Simon Kinsella v. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, et al
as 22-5316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Simon V. Kinsella
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Amanda Lefton, in her official capacity as Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, James F. Bennett, in his official capacity, working for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
South Fork Wind, LLC
Karsch v. Blink Health Ltd
as 22-847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Karsch
Defendant / Appellee:
Blink Health Ltd, FKA Chaiken Holdings LLC, FKA Vital Matters LLC, Geoffrey Chaiken and Matthew Chaiken
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insuran v. Paul Chaiken, et al
as 20-3012
Defendant / Appellant:
MARA J. CHAIKEN and PAUL J. CHAIKEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
In Re: ZF-TRW Airbag Control Units Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2019ml02905
In Re:
ZF-TRW Airbag Control Units Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs, Md Ullah, John Seward and others
Defendant:
Liaison Counsel for Defendants, Toyota Motor Corp, Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03880
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Chaiken et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as ILN/1:13-cv-04800
Plaintiff:
Irwin Chaiken , Carol Chaiken , Anna S Acosta and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc. and Sanofi-Synthelabo Inc
CHAIKEN v. BIOMET, INC et al
as 1:2007cv07000
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS and PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, IMPLANT INNOVATIONS, INC, DEPUY, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DEVICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2007ml09831
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
