Cases
In re: Law Offices of Ben C. Martin v. Babbitt & Johnson PA, et al
as 22-15872
Not Classified By Court: In re: BARD IVC FILTERS PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: DORIS JONES, GEORGE LEUS, GARY MILTON and others
Appellee: BABBITT & JOHNSON PA, BARON & BUD, PC, COMMON BENEFIT FEE AND COST COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellee: C. R. BARD, INC., a New Jersey corporation and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., a subsidiary and/or Division of defendant C.R. Bard, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Appellant: LAW OFFICES OF BEN C. MARTIN and MARTIN BAUGHMAN PLLC
Defendant: CHRISTIAN MOTTAS, CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. and others
CONN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25636
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: ADAM CHARLES CONN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conn et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01660
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Charles Conn and Alyssa Conn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv03820
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER CHARLES CONN
Defendant: MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONA FACILITY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conn et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as TXS/4:14-cv-00298
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff: Charles Conn and Alyssa Conn
Conn et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00298
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff: Charles Conn and Alyssa Conn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01602
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?