Cases 1 - 10 of 46
SAMUELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08225
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E SAMUELS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huguley v. Samuel et al
as 1:2018cv01783
Plaintiff:
Morell Huguley
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuel, Jr., John T. Rathman, Timothy Bowns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Wendell D. Isaac
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meza v. Samuels
as 3:2017cv00597
Plaintiff:
Jesus Meza, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv23044
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons , J Hollingsworth, Dynan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montalban v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jose Montalban
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., FNU Schultz, Tamyra Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Williams v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-12050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (Retired), SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS, Warden-FCC Coleman USP-1 (Retired) and others
Gordon v. Johns et al
as 5:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Gordon
Defendant:
Tracy Johns, George Zoley, Donna Mellendick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Battle v. Drew et al
as 1:2015cv03160
Petitioner:
Earnest D. Battle
Respondent:
Darlene Drew, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., The Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Battle v. Potter et al
as 2:2015cv01247
Petitioner:
Kawaski Ganzga Battle
Respondent:
Ed Potter and Charles E Samuels, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
