Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Charles Hamilton v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-11570
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hamilton v. Emery, et al.
as 1:2012cv01020
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Michael Emery and McLean County Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2011cv04256
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
State of Texas, Harris County, City of Houston Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Harris County Texas et al et al
as 4:2011cv04420
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Harris County Texas et al, Harris County Sheriff Office's and Adrain Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2011cv00510
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
State of Texas, Harris County, City of Houston Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Dir, TDCJ
as 5:2010cv00158
Petitioner:
Lee Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Dir, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Strength et al
as 1:2007cv00111
Plaintiff:
Willie Wesley Brown
Defendant:
Ronald Strength, FNU Ashley, William Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abu-Jamal v. Secretary PA Dept Corr, et al
as 01-9014
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MUMIA ABU-JAMAL, PADRP
Defendant - Rule 43 Substitution:
MARTIN HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant - Appellant:
CONNER BLAINE, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI GREENE, DA PHILADELPHIA, ATTY GEN PA and others
Not Party - Amicus Appellee:
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., NATL LAWYERS GUILD, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BLACK LAWYERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
